South Korea COP30 Climate Action: Coal Phase-Out & 2035 Emissions Target

South Korea’s Climate Turning Point: Phasing Out Coal & Deep Emissions Cuts at COP30

At the 30th United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30) in Belém, Brazil, South Korea announced a series of sweeping climate measures that mark a historic pivot in its energy and environmental policy. The country pledged to phase out coal-fired power plants lacking emission-reducing technologies, set an ambitious greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target for 2035, and deepen its role in global climate diplomacy by joining the Powering Past Coal Alliance (PPCA). These commitments could reshape not only South Korea’s energy future but also have far-reaching geopolitical and economic implications.

1. Context & Background: South Korea’s Energy Landscape

South Korea is among the world's major energy consumers — its economy is heavily industrialized, with a strong reliance on manufacturing, from semiconductors to shipbuilding. Historically, coal has played a central role in sustaining this growth. According to multiple reports, coal still accounts for around 30% of South Korea’s electricity generation. 1

At the same time, the country is a key player in the global coal trade: as one of the largest importers of thermal coal, its energy decisions reverberate across international markets. 2

On the climate front, it has an operational emissions trading scheme (K-ETS) and previously committed to achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. However, critics have argued its pace of coal retirement and renewable adoption has lagged behind what is needed to meet global climate goals. 3

Against this backdrop, the COP30 announcement represents one of the boldest turns yet for Seoul — defining a clear roadmap away from unabated coal and toward a lower-carbon, more sustainable future.

2. The COP30 Announcement: Key Policy Commitments

During COP30, South Korea made several pivotal declarations:

• **Joining the Powering Past Coal Alliance (PPCA):** South Korea publicly committed to the PPCA, an international coalition focused on phasing out unabated coal-fired power. 4
• **Coal phase-out pledge:** Seoul pledged to retire a significant portion of its existing coal plants — specifically, about 40 out of 61 coal-fired power plants are set to be phased out by 2040. 5
• **New coal plant ban:** The government declared it would stop building new coal plants that lack emissions controls (i.e., unabated coal). 6
• **2035 greenhouse gas reduction target:** The country finalized a new Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) to cut emissions by **53%–61% by 2035** compared to 2018 levels. 7
• **Energy mix strategy:** A shift toward renewables and nuclear power, with natural gas reserved only for emergency or peak demand use. 8

Kim Sung-whan, the Climate Minister, framed these steps as part of a “decarbonized green society” vision. He emphasized that this transition is not just about climate ambition, but also about energy security, industrial competitiveness, and job creation. 9

3. Technical Details: What the Coal Phase-Out Means

The coal phase-out pledge is nuanced. It doesn’t mean an overnight shutdown of every coal plant:

• Out of ~61 coal-fired plants, **40 already have confirmed retirement by 2040**. 10
• The **remaining ~21 plants** will be evaluated for closure based on economic and environmental feasibility. A detailed roadmap is expected to be finalized by 2026. 11
• The phrase **“unabated coal”** is key: it refers to coal plants that do not employ large-scale emissions reduction technologies like carbon capture and storage (CCS). 12

Phasing out these plants will require not just their retirement, but a significant build-up in alternative capacity — especially renewables and nuclear power — as well as grid upgrades and energy storage systems.

4. The Emissions Target: 53–61% by 2035

One of the most consequential parts of South Korea’s COP30 announcement is its emissions reduction goal. By 2035, it aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by **53%–61%** compared to 2018. 13

The target was formally approved by the Presidential Commission on Carbon Neutrality and Green Growth. 14 According to the commission’s data, compared to 742.3 million tons of emissions in 2018, the lower bound target (53%) corresponds to roughly 348.9 million tons, while the upper bound (61%) is about 289.5 million tons. 15

The government also detailed how different sectors will contribute:

• **Power sector:** A maximum reduction of **75.3%** compared to 2018, by reducing coal generation and increasing renewables. 16
• **Industry:** Transition via fuel switching, industrial efficiency, and adoption of advanced technologies such as CCUS. 17
• **Buildings:** Electrification, zero-energy construction, and green remodeling. 18
• **Transport:** Rapid deployment of electric & hydrogen vehicles. 19
• **Waste, agriculture, fisheries:** Emissions reductions via recycling, waste-to-energy, and sustainable practices. 20

The government also announced the “K-GX (Green Transformation) Industrial Strategy,” which will support green industries (like solar, wind, EVs, storage) with finance, tax incentives, and investments. 21

5. Economic & Industrial Implications

This energy and climate shift has major economic ramifications:

Manufacturing & Industry: South Korea’s industrial strength — in autos, steel, shipbuilding, electronics — means transitioning away from coal isn't simply about electricity. It’s about reshaping the manufacturing base. Investment in low-carbon processes, new raw materials, and green technologies will probably accelerate.

Jobs & Workforce: Coal plant retirements could displace workers, but the government is framing this as a “just transition”: new jobs are expected in renewables, grid infrastructure, energy storage, nuclear maintenance, and emerging sectors like green hydrogen.

Trade & Energy Security: South Korea’s commitment has potential trade impacts — especially for coal-exporting countries. As one of the world’s top coal importers, its exit from unabated coal sends a strong signal to suppliers. Indeed, analysts say this could reshape thermal coal trade flows. 22

Competitiveness: By prioritizing green growth, South Korea is positioning its firms to stay competitive in a decarbonizing global economy. The new emissions goal also aligns with its ambition to become a leader in green industries.

6. Legal & Social Dimensions

South Korea’s climate moves aren’t just technical — they have a deep social and legal dimension.

In a landmark case, five farmers filed a lawsuit against Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO), claiming fossil fuel emissions, primarily from coal, have contributed to climate change that is damaging their crops. 23

The plaintiffs argue that fluctuating weather patterns, blameable to KEPCO's emissions, have caused significant crop failures. They are seeking damages and also calling for a faster coal phase-out — suggesting 2035 instead of 2040. 24

This case is historically significant: it’s one of the first climate-liability suits in South Korea, highlighting growing public and legal pressure on power utilities. 25

On the social side, the transition will need strong policies for workers in coal regions. Job training, reskilling programs, and economic diversification in coal-dependent areas will be key to ensuring a fair transition.

7. Geopolitical & International Impact

South Korea’s COP30 commitments resonate globally in several ways:

• Coal-exporting countries: As a major coal importer, South Korea’s phase-out creates substantial ripple effects in export markets, especially for countries like Australia. 26
• Climate diplomacy: By joining the PPCA, South Korea strengthens the global narrative of phasing out coal. It also puts pressure on other coal-dependent nations to step up. 27
• Regional energy dynamics: Neighboring economies such as China, Japan, and Southeast Asian countries may watch closely. South Korea’s pivot could influence regional investments, green trade, and cross-border energy cooperation.
• Green technology exports: This transition could boost South Korea’s exports in green tech sectors — EVs, batteries, renewables, grid infrastructure — helping it capture new markets.

Still, some global observers caution that while the pledges are bold, the real test will be implementation and financing. The roadmap (especially for coal retirement) must be credible, enforceable, and backed by investment. Without that, the risk of “climate announcement without action” remains.

8. Challenges & Risks to the Plan

Despite the optimism, several risks could derail South Korea’s ambitions:

• Implementation Complexity: Closing 40 plants by 2040 requires coordinated policy, large capital, and a reliable replacement electricity infrastructure. Delays could undermine credibility.
• Stranded Assets: Coal plants not phased out by 2040 may become “stranded”, losing their economic value — a risk to utilities and investors.
• Financing & Investment Risk: Building renewables at scale, building transmission lines, deploying storage, and possibly supporting CCUS or hydrogen will all need huge investments.
• Grid Stress & Integration: As intermittent renewables grow, ensuring grid stability, demand-response, and storage become critical challenges.
• Public & Political Resistance: While coal is being phased out, nuclear remains controversial. Balancing public acceptance, regulatory approval, and safety will be non-trivial.
• Just Transition Risks: Coal workers, regional economies dependent on coal — if the transition is poorly managed, social backlash could grow.
• Global Market Risks: Exporting coal-dependent economies may push back diplomatically or economically as demand weakens.

9. What’s Next: Key Indicators to Watch

To evaluate whether South Korea’s climate pledges translate into action, these are the critical next steps and indicators:

• 2026 Coal Exit Roadmap: The government has promised a detailed plan by 2026 for shutting down the ~21 remaining coal plants. Stakeholders will be watching for concrete dates, funding, and transition strategies. 28
• Renewable Build-Out: The pace of solar, wind, and storage deployment; how quickly grid capacity is upgraded.
• Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) Reforms: Adjustments in cap settings, auctioning mechanisms, and allowance prices in K-ETS to push more low-carbon investment.
• Just Transition Programs: Training, finance, and support for coal-sector workers and affected regions.
• Court Case Developments: The farmers’ lawsuit against KEPCO may set legal precedents — its progress could influence both public opinion and regulatory pressure. 29
• International Cooperation: Partnerships on green technology, climate finance, and cross-border clean energy projects.

10. Implications for Global Climate & Developing Countries

South Korea’s shift is not just a national matter — its climate turn has broader implications:

For climate governance, it reinforces the narrative that major industrial economies can commit to deep decarbonization while maintaining growth. Its move could pressure other coal-reliant nations to accelerate their own coal-exit strategies.

For developing countries and fossil-fuel exporters, this is a signal: the era of unabated coal demand may soften, pushing them to rethink energy strategies, invest in renewables, and attract green-investment flows.

For global climate equity, South Korea’s “just transition” rhetoric provides a template. If done well, its strategy could become a model for pairing climate ambition with social fairness.

Finally, for innovation and business, this is a huge opportunity. Korean firms in solar, batteries, EVs, grid tech, hydrogen and CCUS may expand rapidly — helping not only South Korea but export markets, including those in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: What exactly does “unabated coal” mean?
Unabated coal refers to coal-fired power plants that do **not** use significant emissions-reduction technologies like carbon capture and storage (CCS). South Korea’s commitment specifically targets these kinds of plants. 30

Q2: Why isn’t South Korea closing all its coal plants immediately?
While 40 out of ~61 are already set for retirement by 2040, the remaining 21 will be evaluated based on economic and environmental feasibility. A detailed roadmap is expected by 2026. 31

Q3: How will South Korea meet its 2035 emissions target?
By heavily cutting emissions in the power sector (up to ~75%), scaling up renewables and nuclear, boosting energy efficiency across industries, transitioning to electric and hydrogen vehicles, and deploying advanced tech such as CCUS. 32

Q4: What is the farmers’ lawsuit about?
A group of South Korean farmers sued the state utility KEPCO, claiming that emissions from its fossil fuel power generation (mostly coal) have contributed to climate-driven weather changes that damage their crops. They are pushing for both compensation and a faster coal phase-out (by 2035). 33

Pros & Cons of South Korea’s COP30 Climate Pledge

Pros:

• Ambitious climate leadership from a major industrial economy.
• Potential for significant emissions reduction and health benefits.
• Boost to green industries, innovation and job creation.
• Positive global signal, especially for coal-exporting countries and developing economies.

Cons & Challenges:

• High financial and technical risk in implementing the coal exit.
• Stranded asset risk for utilities and coal-dependent regions.
• Social risk if the transition isn’t managed equitably.
• Need for credible, enforceable policies — mere announcements won’t guarantee results.

What Stakeholders Can Do

For Policy Makers:

• Develop and publish the detailed coal phase-out roadmap by 2026.
• Ensure just transition programs for workers & communities in coal regions.
• Mobilize investment for renewables, storage, grid upgrades, CCUS and hydrogen.
• Strengthen regulatory mechanisms: tighten ETS caps, enhance allocation plans, monitor compliance.

For Businesses & Investors:

• Assess exposure to coal-fired assets and plan for transition risk.
• Explore opportunities in Korea’s green-energy markets: solar, wind, storage, EVs, green hydrogen.
• Partner with Korean firms or invest in clean-tech ecosystems.

For Civil Society & Citizens:

• Engage with the government on transparency around the coal exit roadmap.
• Push for robust just-transition measures (training, regional development).
• Follow and support the farmers’ lawsuit as a benchmark for corporate climate accountability.

Embedded Video

Note: Change VIDEO_ID to the actual YouTube clip ID.

Conclusion

South Korea’s COP30 pledges represent one of its most significant climate-policy shifts to date. By joining the PPCA, phasing out a large portion of its coal fleet, and committing to a steep emissions-reduction target by 2035, Seoul is signaling serious intent to transform. The path forward won’t be easy — the country faces social, economic, and technical challenges. But if implemented well, this pivot could catalyze not just a greener South Korea, but also influence global energy markets, trade dynamics, and climate diplomacy.

Don’t miss a beat — follow us for expert reporting on the global energy transition